Pentium4 extreme edition

Such a high clock rate in the P4 EE deserves its fair share of credit, as processors with increasing cache are more sensitive to clock increases. They also have little tolerance for overclocking. Considering the fact that the Extreme is a processor based on the relatively old nm technology, 4 GHz is impressive.

As a comparison: Intel's road map doesn't envisage 4 GHz processors before the fourth quarter of this year. We have already reviewed one of the extreme desktop processors - the fashion that drove mad both leading x86 CPU makers.

Both companies had the same idea in mind when designing these models: AMD says that its baby is the only processor in its class designed specially for cinematic computing and provides the powerful technology for stunning games and wonderful multimedia entertainment; Intel says that its processor allows creating realistic physical models and ensures operation of intelligence systems providing exceptional features for gamers and demanding users.

In short, these processors are meant for games. However, the companies have a different attitude toward the future of their babies: Intel admits that they don't care whether the Pentium 4 EE or XE?

In contrast, AMD is aggressively pushing the idea of the extreme desktop processor into life. Later we will see what are the grounds of both companies. First of all, let's look at the processors. What's it? A new trend in the CPU building? Special extreme solutions? Or what? First, let's see what CPU lines both companies got and what their specs are. The memory clock indicated is the highest possible Well, the table shows where the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition and Athlon 64 FX originate from.

Pentium 4 Extreme Edition It reminds an ordinary Pentium Also, it got a bus from the modern Pentium 4 MHz , runs at a higher clock speed. Intel could even leave the SMP supported as there's no chance to get a dual P4 EE - hardly anyone would dare to make such a board. But the Xeon MP doesn't have respective boards look at the requirements for the modules in the above example , while the P4 EE can be easily installed on desktop mainboards equipped with ordinary memory.

It's hard to say whether the die was redesigned - I think not. It looks identical to the Pentium 4 - only the marking and back side differ.

The core working at the clock higher by MHz can be the result of more careful selection of the Opteron samples, and the support for the registered DDR instead of DDR was already discussed. But such a simple way of its development turns out to be its disadvantage. At the same time, AMD's Opteron is still the Opteron, with a server socket which requires a specific board and support for just registered memory.

It's quite a problem to find registered DDR modules today. The worst disadvantage of the Athlon 64 FX is that it's impossible to upgrade the Athlon 64 to the Athlon 64 FX without replacing the board and memory.

The preliminary scores of the processors are the following: the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition gets A it's a pure desktop processor in all respects whatever it has inside , the Athlon 64 FX gets C they should think of its other parameters instead of just remarking it. But they probably had no choice as the desktop Socket , a standard for the AMD64 architecture, doesn't support processors with a dual-channel memory controller.

Still, it doesn't justify AMD - they should have taken it into account beforehand. Well, let's test their performance and see what their real scores are.

Testing Testbed: Processors: Intel Pentium 4 3. However, these diagrams will help us interpret the scores in the other tests; so, the memory was tested in the Cachemem and CacheBurst32 synthetic benchmarks. In the write speed tests both extreme editions perform equally well, with the ordinary Pentium 4 falling behind them. Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up to comment. Privacy Policy. Contact Us. Terms of Use. Show Full Site. All rights reserved. Log in Don't have an account?

Sign up now Username Password Remember Me. The browser version you are using is not recommended for this site. Please consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser by clicking one of the following links. You can search our catalog of processors, chipsets, kits, SSDs, server products and more in several ways. Brand Name: Core i7. Product Number: iU. Code Name: Kaby Lake. The Intel processor number is just one of several factors—along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks—to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.

Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer nm , indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor. Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component die or chip.

Processor Base Frequency describes the rate at which the processor's transistors open and close. The processor base frequency is the operating point where TDP is defined.

Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz GHz , or billion cycles per second. CPU Cache is an area of fast memory located on the processor. A bus is a subsystem that transfers data between computer components or between computers. Thermal Design Power TDP represents the average power, in watts, the processor dissipates when operating at Base Frequency with all cores active under an Intel-defined, high-complexity workload.

Refer to Datasheet for thermal solution requirements. VID Voltage Range is an indicator of the minimum and maximum voltage values at which the processor is designed to operate. Embedded Options Available indicates products that offer extended purchase availability for intelligent systems and embedded solutions. See your Intel representative for details. Physical Address Extensions PAE is a feature that allows bit processors to access a physical address space larger than 4 gigabytes.